Use Your Vote Or Lose Your Vote

A ripple of excitement a few days ago in Lotus Land when the New Democratic Party won two seats in provincial bye-elections in British Columbia. One headline suggested it was the start of a “come back” for the NDP, the party media and pollsters had favoured to win the 2013 general election – and were disastrously wrong.

Radio and television stations burbled the same theme seemingly determined to repeat their inaccurate readings of political indicators – or maybe believing the old saying that if you forecast the same election victors often enough, one year you’ll get it right.

Whatever their reasoning they should know better. Bye-elections are not always lost by the political party in power, but they usually are. Bye-elections give the people, including party faithful, the opportunity to send a signal to government that performance is being watched; that it holds power courtesy the electorate and can be removed from office should it wander from the paths of truth and justice.

A bye-election vote may be a warning shot across the bows, but it is not the same as a general election broadside designed to banish the government in power and replace it with one with more promise of better management. The bye-elections in Coquitlam-Burke Mountain and Vancouver Mount Pleasant were far from damaging broadsides aimed at the Liberal government and equally far from a ringing endorsement of NDP candidates – even in Vancouver-Mount Pleasant which is surely one of the safest, if not the safest, NDP seat in the province.

There are 40,000 registered voters in the riding where the NDP’s Melanie Mark sought to replace Jennie Kwan in the February 2 vote. In the 2013 general election Kwan had been returned to office – again – with 12,154 of the 21,031 registered votes cast. The Liberal candidate was close to nine thousand votes behind with 3,505.

When the bye-election vote was taken only 8,801 valid votes out of the possible 40,000 were cast. Ms. Mark, NDP, attracted 5,353; Liberal Gavin Dew was a distant third in the five candidate race with 994. Well ahead of Dew was Peter Fry of the Green Party with 2,325 of the total valid votes cast – about 200 more than they had received in the 2013 general election.

There were no surprises in the runaway NDP victory or in the desultory Liberal loss of 2,000 votes in a riding they could never win. There was some surprise in the Green Party vote. To attract more votes in a bye-election than you did in a general election has to be a boost for the Cinderella Party as the province heads for May 2017 and the next general election.

In Coquitlam-Burke Mountain the race was always regarded as tighter than Vancouver-Mount Pleasant – and so it proved with the NDP taking the seat with 3,607 votes to dislodge the Liberals with 2,954. The Green Party trailed in third with 1,051 – only 90 or so votes less than the 2013 general election vote.

No real surprises in either result or in the shameful turnout in both ridings. Quite amazing really that with all the effort Elections BC has gone to make voting easy, only 8,801 of 40,000 registered voters could stir themselves to vote in Vancouver-Mount Pleasant and only 7,757 of close to 39,000 in Coquitlam-Burke Mountain could find 10-minutes of time to cast a ballot.

Maybe Elections Canada and Elections BC have made it too easy for us to vote in any election – general or bye. I wonder what would happen if federal and provincial voting laws were changed with a “use it or lose it” slogan in mind. No more “please vote” pleas, no more suggestion of fines for not voting – just a removal of the right to vote. Failure to vote in a municipal, provincial or federal elections bye-election would cost a citizen the right to vote in the next election – a right which could only be restored by a subsequent recorded vote registered by a returning officer.

Just a thought: Use it or lose it – and I confess to a fear that many thousands across Canada wouldn’t care.


  1. I always regarded bye-election results irrelevant unless they changed the balance in the legislature.

    As for use it or lose it I think it’s an idea to pursue; certainly many wouldn’t care but then we’d be left with a hardcore electorate with whom candidates could have a serious discussion.

  2. Re: use it or lose it. Unfortunately , as things stand, your last sentence is correct. But I do not think (UIOLI) is the way to go. I think there are studies that have tried to identify poor voter turnouts. My own feeling is that voter indifference is partly caused by a feeling of powerlessness. That is: “what difference would my vote make”?

    I have forgotten whether it was a Greek or Roman personage (or neither) who used a stick to show the power of a bundle versus a single stick. The first strong, the second weak. ( resisting breaking by bending) No doubt you can put me straight on the wording and origin! are my thoughts :

    Start by becoming politically active in selecting a candidate for the Party of your choice . Then be as active as you can in developing Party aims and objectives. Then do as much as you can (labourwise and dollar wise) to support your party between and during elections. Then if elected, monitor your candidates, to see if they remember who elected them. And do not forget as times change, get ready to adapt. There is nothing new in any of my thoughts , and I get exhausted in even writing them down. Diminished NRG!!. And I have no proof that they prove effective. My late wife and I were politically active in the 1992-2000 era. Shortly after, The Reform Party of Canada “ evaporated . “

    Cheers- keep your powder dry and keep firing. J.A. (Al) Pelter

  3. I forgot to say that if UIOLI survives a legal challenge, it is very likely it would increase voter turnout. But having said this, what would it really accomplish in producing a functioning democratic government? It takes a lot more than a commitment to trundle to the polling station once every 4 years to get this. Yes, WORK, WORK and more. J.A.(Al) Pelter

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s